ILSI entities around the world publish scientific articles on original research, literature reviews and gap analyses, as well as meeting proceedings in peer-reviewed journals and publications. Not one of the 1,000+ articles that ILSI has published over the last 45 years has ever been retracted. ILSI also publishes books, monographs, white papers, other scientific reports, annual reports and newsletters.
ILSI's flawless scientific publication track record, its commitment to the highest scientific standards and its adherence to rigorous scientific principles demonstrate its scientific integrity.
ILSI's publications are listed below by publication date, from the newest article to the oldest. You can also filter the list by title or publication type.
Publication Date
Z to A
The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes: Results of a Systematic Review
Nutrients, 2022
- ILSI Europe
Commissioned by the Obesity and Diabetes Task Force
The Status and Impact of Biosafety Regulation in Developing Economies Since Ratification of the Cartagena Protocol
2012
- International Life Sciences Institute
This paper explores how the Cartagena Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity, as well as other important drivers, have affected the regulation of GE crops in developing countries.
The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods: Guidelines Prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force
1996
- ILSI Europe
Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1996;34(10):931-940.
The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Concepts to Determine Their Safety in Use
2003
- ILSI Europe
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2003;54:1-32.
The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Concepts to Determine Their Safety in Use
2003
- ILSI Europe
ILSI Europe Report Series.
WP_Query Object
(
[query] => Array
(
[post_type] => publication
[posts_per_page] => 5
[type] =>
[area] =>
[committee] =>
[authors] =>
[showtitle] =>
[meta_query] => Array
(
[relation] => AND
)
[tax_query] => Array
(
)
[paged] => 11
[orderby] => title
[order] => DESC
)
[query_vars] => Array
(
[post_type] => publication
[posts_per_page] => 5
[type] =>
[area] =>
[committee] =>
[authors] =>
[showtitle] =>
[meta_query] => Array
(
[relation] => AND
)
[tax_query] => Array
(
)
[paged] => 11
[orderby] => title
[order] => DESC
[error] =>
[m] =>
[p] => 0
[post_parent] =>
[subpost] =>
[subpost_id] =>
[attachment] =>
[attachment_id] => 0
[name] =>
[pagename] =>
[page_id] => 0
[second] =>
[minute] =>
[hour] =>
[day] => 0
[monthnum] => 0
[year] => 0
[w] => 0
[category_name] =>
[tag] =>
[cat] =>
[tag_id] =>
[author] =>
[author_name] =>
[feed] =>
[tb] =>
[meta_key] =>
[meta_value] =>
[preview] =>
[s] =>
[sentence] =>
[title] =>
[fields] =>
[menu_order] =>
=>
[category__in] => Array
(
)
[category__not_in] => Array
(
)
[category__and] => Array
(
)
[post__in] => Array
(
)
[post__not_in] => Array
(
)
[post_name__in] => Array
(
)
[tag__in] => Array
(
)
[tag__not_in] => Array
(
)
[tag__and] => Array
(
)
[tag_slug__in] => Array
(
)
[tag_slug__and] => Array
(
)
[post_parent__in] => Array
(
)
[post_parent__not_in] => Array
(
)
[author__in] => Array
(
)
[author__not_in] => Array
(
)
[search_columns] => Array
(
)
[ignore_sticky_posts] =>
[suppress_filters] =>
[cache_results] => 1
[update_post_term_cache] => 1
[update_menu_item_cache] =>
[lazy_load_term_meta] => 1
[update_post_meta_cache] => 1
[nopaging] =>
[comments_per_page] => 50
[no_found_rows] =>
)
[tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object
(
[queries] => Array
(
)
[relation] => AND
[table_aliases:protected] => Array
(
)
[queried_terms] => Array
(
)
[primary_table] => wp_posts
[primary_id_column] => ID
)
[meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object
(
[queries] => Array
(
)
[relation] => AND
[meta_table] =>
[meta_id_column] =>
[primary_table] =>
[primary_id_column] =>
[table_aliases:protected] => Array
(
)
[clauses:protected] => Array
(
)
[has_or_relation:protected] =>
)
[date_query] =>
[request] =>
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID
FROM wp_posts
WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'publication' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish' OR wp_posts.post_status = 'acf-disabled')))
ORDER BY wp_posts.post_title DESC
LIMIT 50, 5
[posts] => Array
(
[0] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 32510
[post_author] => 24
[post_date] => 2022-05-30 03:04:45
[post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 07:04:45
[post_content] =>
Obesity and Diabetes
Nutrition Security and Societal Aspects
Background: The gold-standard techniques for measuring insulin sensitivity and secretion are well established. However, they may be perceived as invasive and expensive for use in dietary intervention studies. Thus, surrogate markers have been proposed as alternative markers for insulin sensitivity and secretion. This systematic review aimed to identify markers of insulin sensitivity and secretion in response to dietary intervention and assess their suitability as surrogates for the gold-standard methodology. Methods: Three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched, intervention studies and randomised controlled trials reporting data on dietary intake, a gold standard of analysis of insulin sensitivity (either euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp or intravenous glucose tolerance test and secretion (acute insulin response to glucose), as well as surrogate markers for insulin sensitivity (either fasting insulin, area under the curve oral glucose tolerance tests and HOMA-IR) and insulin secretion (disposition index), were selected. Results: We identified thirty-five studies that were eligible for inclusion. We found insufficient evidence to predict insulin sensitivity and secretion with surrogate markers when compared to gold standards in nutritional intervention studies. Conclusions: Future research is needed to investigate if surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion can be repeatable and reproducible in the same way as gold standards.
Keywords
Expand
Insulin Sensitivity; Insulin Secretion; Gold Standard; Surrogate Markers; Dietary Intervention Studies
To download this open-access article, please click here.
This work was commissioned by the Obesity and Diabetes Task Force.
[post_title] => The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes: Results of a Systematic Review
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-use-and-effectiveness-of-selected-alternative-markers-for-insulin-sensitivity-and-secretion-compared-with-gold-standard-markers-in-dietary-intervention-studies-in-individuals-without-diabetes-res
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-05-31 05:10:37
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-05-31 09:10:37
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=32510
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[1] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 3355
[post_author] => 12
[post_date] => 2016-06-17 03:38:45
[post_date_gmt] => 2016-06-17 03:38:45
[post_content] =>
[post_title] => The Status and Impact of Biosafety Regulation in Developing Economies Since Ratification of the Cartagena Protocol
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-status-and-impact-of-biosafety-regulation-in-developing-economies-since-ratification-of-the-cartagena-protocol
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2016-06-27 16:32:38
[post_modified_gmt] => 2016-06-27 20:32:38
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=3355
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[2] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 4300
[post_author] => 12
[post_date] => 2016-06-28 19:44:42
[post_date_gmt] => 2016-06-28 19:44:42
[post_content] =>
[post_title] => The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods: Guidelines Prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-safety-assessment-of-novel-foods-guidelines-prepared-by-ilsi-europe-novel-food-task-force
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2016-06-28 15:44:42
[post_modified_gmt] => 2016-06-28 19:44:42
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=4300
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[3] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 4119
[post_author] => 12
[post_date] => 2016-06-27 19:10:12
[post_date_gmt] => 2016-06-27 19:10:12
[post_content] =>
[post_title] => The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Concepts to Determine Their Safety in Use
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-safety-assessment-of-novel-foods-and-concepts-to-determine-their-safety-in-use-2
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2016-06-27 15:15:47
[post_modified_gmt] => 2016-06-27 19:15:47
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=4119
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[4] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 4120
[post_author] => 12
[post_date] => 2016-06-27 19:06:19
[post_date_gmt] => 2016-06-27 19:06:19
[post_content] =>
[post_title] => The Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Concepts to Determine Their Safety in Use
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-safety-assessment-of-novel-foods-and-concepts-to-determine-their-safety-in-use
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2016-06-27 15:15:53
[post_modified_gmt] => 2016-06-27 19:15:53
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=4120
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
)
[post_count] => 5
[current_post] => -1
[before_loop] =>
[in_the_loop] =>
[post] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 32510
[post_author] => 24
[post_date] => 2022-05-30 03:04:45
[post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 07:04:45
[post_content] =>
Obesity and Diabetes
Nutrition Security and Societal Aspects
Background: The gold-standard techniques for measuring insulin sensitivity and secretion are well established. However, they may be perceived as invasive and expensive for use in dietary intervention studies. Thus, surrogate markers have been proposed as alternative markers for insulin sensitivity and secretion. This systematic review aimed to identify markers of insulin sensitivity and secretion in response to dietary intervention and assess their suitability as surrogates for the gold-standard methodology. Methods: Three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched, intervention studies and randomised controlled trials reporting data on dietary intake, a gold standard of analysis of insulin sensitivity (either euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp or intravenous glucose tolerance test and secretion (acute insulin response to glucose), as well as surrogate markers for insulin sensitivity (either fasting insulin, area under the curve oral glucose tolerance tests and HOMA-IR) and insulin secretion (disposition index), were selected. Results: We identified thirty-five studies that were eligible for inclusion. We found insufficient evidence to predict insulin sensitivity and secretion with surrogate markers when compared to gold standards in nutritional intervention studies. Conclusions: Future research is needed to investigate if surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion can be repeatable and reproducible in the same way as gold standards.
Keywords
Expand
Insulin Sensitivity; Insulin Secretion; Gold Standard; Surrogate Markers; Dietary Intervention Studies
To download this open-access article, please click here.
This work was commissioned by the Obesity and Diabetes Task Force.
[post_title] => The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes: Results of a Systematic Review
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => closed
[ping_status] => closed
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => the-use-and-effectiveness-of-selected-alternative-markers-for-insulin-sensitivity-and-secretion-compared-with-gold-standard-markers-in-dietary-intervention-studies-in-individuals-without-diabetes-res
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-05-31 05:10:37
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-05-31 09:10:37
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://ilsi.org/?post_type=publication&p=32510
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => publication
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[comment_count] => 0
[current_comment] => -1
[found_posts] => 791
[max_num_pages] => 159
[max_num_comment_pages] => 0
[is_single] =>
[is_preview] =>
[is_page] =>
[is_archive] =>
[is_date] =>
[is_year] =>
[is_month] =>
[is_day] =>
[is_time] =>
[is_author] =>
[is_category] =>
[is_tag] =>
[is_tax] =>
[is_search] =>
[is_feed] =>
[is_comment_feed] =>
[is_trackback] =>
[is_home] => 1
[is_privacy_policy] =>
[is_404] =>
[is_embed] =>
[is_paged] => 1
[is_admin] =>
[is_attachment] =>
[is_singular] =>
[is_robots] =>
[is_favicon] =>
[is_posts_page] =>
[is_post_type_archive] =>
[query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8fb5f38f21aeffe904a16999e2983749
[query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] =>
[thumbnails_cached] =>
[allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] =>
[stopwords:WP_Query:private] =>
[compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array
(
[0] => query_vars_hash
[1] => query_vars_changed
)
[compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array
(
[0] => init_query_flags
[1] => parse_tax_query
)
)